Biases of Sexual Abuse Experts

Biases of Sexual Abuse Experts


Last Updated: 15-11-2018 2:39


Description Preview




The attached document is a study performed on the biases of the child sexual abuse experts. Be certain that Sandra Glenney has contact information for therapists that will deliver for her. This study exposes the issue.  Always assume that Glenney’s expert will testify that abuse occurred.  This is the case with Dr. Mary Lindahl.

From the study a critical statement

Studies of expert classificatory reliability in cases of alleged child sexual abuse have demonstrated predictably high rates of error (Horner-Guyer pre- dictions) on the part of clinicians using clinically derived data to classify individuals as abusers/nonabusers. Rates of false positive classification have been shown to be many times greater than the rates of false negative classification.’

The alleged experts always, the majority of the time, assume that abuse has occurred. There assumption is not based on science but gut feeling. I should say it is a financial decision, Glenney pays $150 per hour.  There is an incentive to testify that abuse has occurred.


APA Child Evaluation Guidelines

APA Child Evaluation Guidelines


Last Updated: 04-11-2018 17:08


Description Preview





As incredible as it may same, despite the type of biased  crazy therapists that Sandra Glenney qualifies as an export witness, that witness is subject to guidelines from the American Psychological Association (APA) . The cases of hysteria in the  80’s and 90’s brought the crackpots out in search for easy money. It is my deep belief that no ethical psychologist will ever testify for Sandra Glenney, only the hacks.

The attached file is the suggested guidelines from the APA, it depicts how the psychologists should conduct themselves.

Rest assured that Glenney’s hired gun will fail miserably at Guideline 4.

Guideline 4. The role of psychologists who conduct child protection evaluations is that of a professional expert who strives to maintain an unbiased, impartial approach to the evaluation.

Trust me, Glenney’s hired gun is their to find abuse nothing more.

Your attorney needs to know the guidelines and read them to the therapist in Court, especially as pertains to guidelines .

Guideline 5. Psychologists strive to gain competence sufficient to provide effective and ethical forensic services when conducting child protection evaluations and when addressing case-specific issues that may require specialized professional knowledge, training, or skills.


Also, keep in mind you need to establish how often Glenney’s therapist testifies for the County. Glenney will tend to sue the same psychologists over and over again.

Guideline 7. Psychologists providing child protection evaluations strive to avoid role conflicts and multiple relationships that may compromise their objectivity, competence, or effectiveness, or that may otherwise risk harm or exploitation to the person or identified client (e.g., court, state child protection agency) with whom the professional relationship exists.

Loudoun CPS Sandra Glenny Witch Hunter – Cautio Criminalis


cautio criminalisglenney

If there is one book that Sandra Glenney should read it is “Cautio Criminalis” written by Jesuit Priest Friedrich Spree. The ironic twist is that the book was written in the 1600′s during the European Witch Trials.  Although Glenney’s official title is Assistant Count Attorney, in reality she is nothing more than a cheap version of close minded witch hunter, who is fanatic in her beliefs.

Continue reading