Monthly Archives: February 2015

image_pdfimage_print

Loudoun County – Ellen Grunewald, Laurie Warhol, Sandra Glenney

image_pdfimage_print

Thanks to an avid reader, I have the salary information for Ellen Grunewald, Laurie Warhol and Sandra Glenney. Ms. Grunewald and Ms. Warhol are both employed by Loudoun Social Services. Sandra Glenney is the Assistant County Attorney. Their annual salaries are below

Sandra Glenney – $106,353

Ellen Grunewald – $155,663.04

Laurie Warhol – $97,066.32

 

Loudoun County – Christopher Zveare

image_pdfimage_print

 

zvearememo

The admission of evidence in a Courtroom , in theory should not be a game of smoke and mirrors. It should not be the case that a litigant can submit suspect documents and hope that a judge will not allow the documents to be impeached. This is exactly what happened in a case that involved Christopher Zveare with Judge Thomas D. Horne presiding.

In the case involving Christopher Zveare, this is exactly what happened.  In his corner he had one-time judicial candidate  Lorrie Sinclair. He also had in his corner the always very unethical Sandra Glenney. Most importantly, the jurist hearing his case Judge Thomas D. Horne. Horne was willing to do business. I must add that the every present Dr. Mary Lindahl was also in his corner.

The document that Zveare provided was expired, no longer in use by the Federal Government.  The document wasn’t signed and there was no contact information for the alleged author Sally Cowen. One must keep in mind that Judge Horne , in his career, has seen a vast multitude of documents. He knew that this document was suspect.

Judge Horne was told that the author of the memorandum, Sally Cowen, could not be found. He was also told that Zveare’s claims of national security as to why he couldn’t reveal the name of his employer were bogus. Judge Horne did not care, he denied any and all discovery.

Christopher Zveare was confident , for some reason , that Horne would not require any type of discovery. It was a debacle  and disgrace in the Courtroom.  Zveare felt very comfortable submitting this very suspect document, one wonders why,

 

Loudoun County – Lorrie Sinclair is not the judicial candidate

image_pdfimage_print

Good news to report for the 20th Circuit, Lorrie Sinclair is not being considered for the new seat on the Circuit Court in the 20th Circuit.  The interview schedule for the judicial candidates has been released. The candidate for the 20th Circuit  is Douglas L. Fleming Jr. not Lorrie Sinclair. Loudoun County we can breathe, at least for a little while.

Kudos and congrats to the 20th Circuit legislators for not accepting Lorrie Sinclair as a judicial candidate.

 

Loudoun County – Sandra Glenney, Dr. Lindahl

image_pdfimage_print

A parent who disappears, if he’s spoken of at all, is at the mercy of the one who stays  behind and of a child’s wishy washy memory

From “Take this man” by Brando Skyhorse.

This statement is direct and incredibly truthful. In the world of Sandra Glenney , assistant County Attorney, and one of her favorite psychologists , Dr. Mary Lindahl this is very  true.  They understand memory as it relates to a child. Lindahl is aware of child’s wishy washy memory and she takes full advantage of it.  Lindahl is well aware of how easy memory can be manipulated, as well as Glenney is. It is important to understand that Lindahl isn’t the only one, any psychologist that Glenney uses is going to think like Lindahl. The psychologists that testify for Glenney and are akin to a witches coven, it is a very small but tight circle.

Glenney , along with the backing and the sanctioning of the court, is the one who makes the parent disappear.   Perhaps , her most avid backers are on the Circuit Bench in Loudoun. If she loses in Juvenile Court, Glenney will appeal immediately to the Loudoun Circuit Court. The parents who are falsely accused in Loudoun, are accused because they want to be involved in their child’s life. The accusations are a tool used to make the other parent disappear.  Lindahl, on demand , provides the required testimony to ensure this happens. It is a nice little racket they run with the blessing of the Court. It is a racket, it isn’t justice , it is a racket and the players are Glenney, Lindahl and any judge in Loudoun who goes along with it. One of the more notorious judges to go along with it was Judge Thomas D. Horne.

The research is clear on children and memory, younger children and their memory can easily be manipulated.  This manipulation is done by unscrupulous mental health professionals. The following link at dougmesner.com has a vast source of material that describes the problems with Lindahl’s type of psychotherapy.   I would encourage everyone to read the material. Some of the material provides excellent insight into the therapeutic abuses of the past.

However in the world of Dr. Lindahl she doesn’t see it this way.  Either she doesn’t know the research about memory and false accusations or she simply doesn’t care. Perhaps she simply wants the $150 per hour she commands from Loudoun County.  Along with the battleground for memory , the concept of child suggestibility will surface during a false accusation case.  Below are excerpts from a hearing in which Dr. Lindahl attempted to explain why she felt a four-year old was resistant to suggestion.  It can be expected that Lindahl will always testify that  the child in question will  always be resistant to suggestibility,

Q. Can you give me some examples of how she’s usually resistant of how the child is unusually resistant to suggestion?

A. Lindahl’s answer “I haven’t tried to suggest to her”

It should be obvious that Dr. Lindahl is going to testify that any child is resistant to suggestion , if it fits the needs of Sandra Glenney. Lindahl’s methods are junk and were debunked in the 80′s and 90′s. Glenney uses her for one reason and one reason only.  She testifies to what Glenney wants.

Please be aware of the team of Lindahl and Glenney,