Judicial Interview of Lorrie Sinclair and Sean Morgan

Judicial Interview of Lorrie Sinclair and Sean Morgan


Last Updated: 13-01-2019 1:49


Description Preview


The attached file is the audio of the 20th Circuit Legislator’s interview of  Lorrie Sinclair and Sean Morgan. I think, based of the interview, that Sean Morgan is the better candidate. How he did not receive a rating of ”Highly Recommended”  from the Loudoun Bar is beyond comprehension. He has participated in two capital  cases compared to 0 for Sinclair.

He has worked for the Department of Justice, Sinclair never has. He was incredibly honest with his greatest success and failure during his career. He provided exact cases. Sinclair rambled when asked the same question. She could not provide specific cases.

Mr. Morgan simply has more meaningful experience.  Please take a listen,.






Lorrie Sinclair NAACP and Phillip Thompson




There is quite a bit of controversy concerning the vacancy on the 20th Circuit bench and wouldn’t you know it  Lorrie Sinclair is at the center of it.  Sinclair seems to think that the NAACP is going to push her to the bench. With that enter Phillip Thompson, who sees racism everywhere and who believes Sinclair should ascend to the bench based on race.

Is Phillip Thompson a racist, google his name. He makes plenty of incendiary remarks. What has he accomplished in Loudoun, other than making ridiculous  statements. You know, how it was racist that he got pulled over by a cop. You know, how he was all over the fake receipt at Anita’s. Now he has taken up the case of Lorrie Sinclair,  in his world view Sinclair is the victim of cold hard cruel white racism. In reality , she is not a good candidate.

Justice is blind, that’s the theory. Loudoun may need a minority candidate but it isn’t Sinclair.



Lorrie Sinclair – She will not go away




Lorrie Sinclair simply will not go away, despite her inadequacies as a Judicial candidate.  This does not stop Sinclair from incredibly believing she is a qualified candidate.  James P. Fisher has already been interviewed, which was successful. However the local Loudoun Bar doesn’t seem to like James P. Fisher  article here.  When Lorrie Sinclair is your front running candidate,  you know you are in trouble. Sinclair is not judicial material. The Loudoun Bar is completely off base with recommending Sinclair. Her appointment would be an example of failing upwards.  Not to mention that she attempted to prosecute an innocent man, Bruce McLaughlin.

Sinclair has made no notable achievement to the Loudoun Legal community.unless you count suing your sorority and trying to incarcerate an innocent person.  The local bar, they are discrediting themselves by supporting Sinclair.




State Department FOIA Ruling

State Department FOIA Ruling


Last Updated: 08-12-2018 13:25


Description Preview





Judge Horne, played the part of a whore, as concerned with Christopher Zveare. A real judge follows the evidence and allows the discovery of evidence. Horne didn’t do that, he took the coward’s way out.  You see Christopher Zveare is nothing more than a cheap liar and very bad producer of fake documents.  A simple granting of discovery would have uncovered Zveare’s perjury. Instead of that Judge Horne played the whore.


The attached document is a ruling from a real judge with real integrity. He is simply allowing discovery

”Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants”. 

In the attached ruling, the judge has the courage to allow discovery. It could be possibly make Obama and Hillary Clinton look even worse. This courage to allow discovery.

Horne is a coward, he was close to retirement when Zveare submitted his fake documents to the Court. If he would allowed discovery, there would have been no political penalty to pay.  He chose to protect Sandra Glenney and Lorrie SInclair.